Use case · Launch

Get covered faster, on evidence from real patients.

Payers are deciding right now. Show them effectiveness and tolerability in the people actually taking it, from records that already exist.

See what’s in the data →

Why it matters now

Payers ask about the patients you are treating now.

They want to see it working in people with three comorbidities and a prior line of therapy. That population is in here, with the history behind them, and a coverage decision is live this quarter.

What you get

Four things you can do in the first year.

  1. Generate post-approval evidence fast

    Effectiveness and tolerability in the population that’s actually taking it, from records that already exist.

  2. Answer a payer inside a week

    Rapid-turn cohorts when a formulary committee asks a question you didn’t plan for. Days, while the question is still live.

  3. See how it’s prescribed against the label

    Where practice has drifted from the label, and whether outcomes follow. That’s the evidence behind both your medical education and your risk picture.

  4. Give your field teams something local

    Site and region-level insight your MSLs and access teams can take into a conversation, with the local detail their conversation turns on.

Where teams use it

Seven jobs this does in year one.

  • Formulary dossier evidence

    Market Access · HEOR
  • Real-world effectiveness by subgroup

    Field medical
  • Tolerability and discontinuation evidence

    Medical Affairs
  • Prior authorisation objection handling

    Medical Affairs
  • MSL territory insight

    HEOR
  • Label-concordant versus real practice

    Market Access
  • Publication-grade real-world cohorts

    RWE

Payer asked you something new? Send us the question. We’ll show you what the data covers before you spend anything.

Tell us which payer is next.

We’ll show you what we can put in front of them, and how quickly.